Pregnant women and children first? CDC announces H1N1 vaccine recommendations

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Here is who should be first in line this fall when the H1N1 vaccine becomes available, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control announced today: Pregnant women, all children (except those under six months old), teens and young adults up to 24 years old, people with babies under six months old, health care workers and nonelderly adults who have underlying medical conditions.

“We really should go out full force to make sure these groups get addressed,” Anne Schuchat, the CDC National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Disease director, said at a press conference in Atlanta, Ga.

The entire group, estimated to sum up to just under 149 million people, will be the primary targets for the first rounds of vaccine but in no particular order. Only in rare situations of shortages, Schuchat noted, would certain sectors within that larger group be prioritized (bringing the total number of the core down to about 41 million).

But it’s unlikely that all—or possibly even most—of those in the recommended groups will get the vaccine, as less than 42 percent of those recommended to get the seasonal flu vaccine actually have in years past.

The vaccine supply may be more limited in the U.S. than other countries, however, as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not licensed any vaccines that use adjuvants, which increase the effectiveness of the dose, thereby making smaller amounts of the actual antigen necessary.

Notably missing from the list was the 65-plus crowd, which is often hit hard by seasonal flu. But, as Schuchat explained, “The H1N1 virus has been sparing those people to a large extent.”

The announcement comes a day after a study was published online in The Lancet detailing the higher risk that pregnant women face from the flu. The study analyzed the 34 cases of pregnant women who were diagnosed with the flu in April and May of this year. Of those women, 11 of them were hospitalized and six died. These hospitalization and fatality rates were far higher than those for the average population.

Although pregnant women have many of the same initial H1N1 virus symptoms as the rest of the population, complications are much more likely, according to the study, which recommends that pregnant women be given Tamiflu before test results for the virus even come back. Many health care workers, however, were initially reluctant to dispense the antiviral because, as the study notes, “information about the safety and effectiveness of these anti-influenza drugs during pregnancy is scarce.” But the general sentiment is now that, “the benefits of treatment with these drugs are likely to outweigh potential risks to the fetus,” the paper concludes.

Image courtesy of iStockphoto/AndreasReh

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe