Quiet year for twister research in Tornado Alley

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The 100-plus researchers who set out earlier this year on the biggest scientific twister hunt in history have returned with few tornado tales to tell.

The VORTEX2 project (the Verification of Rotation in Tornadoes EXperiment 2) is a two-year, $10.5-million undertaking planned to study tornadoes in hopes of improving early warning systems.

But this first year of study turned out to be an unusually quiet one for twisters. In the first six months of the year, 826 tornadoes were recorded, according to an Associated Press report. That might sound like a ton—even to Dorothy and Toto types. But it’s a good gust fewer than the average for each of the past three years—which is 934—and a lot less than last year, in which 1,304 tornadoes had spun up by June 30.

“It was very, very unusual,” Joe Schaefer, director of the Storm Prediction Center in Norman, Okla., told the AP. In fact, in peak tornado season, more than two weeks went by without a single tornado warning going out in the U.S.

“You’re out there to do the experiment and you’re geared up every day and ready,” Don Burgess, of the University of Oklahoma, told the AP. “And when there isn’t anything happening, that is frustrating.”

Meteorologists attribute the sedate season to the spring and summer’s unusual jet stream pattern, which has been flowing more east-west across the nation’s midsection rather than the more common south-north direction. The change has also been blamed on other aberrant weather patterns, such as the severe drought in Texas and the Northeast’s cool, wet summer.

One big tornado did spin up over Wyoming in June, however, which gave the scientific storm chasers a good sample. And they will be back in the hunt late next winter to see if 2010 brings more wild weather their way.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe