Rare star-to-supernova link established

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A supernova, or stellar explosion, some 200 million light-years away has been traced to its progenitor star, one of only a few times the source of a supernova has been identified based on pre- and post-supernova images.

Astrophysicist Avishay Gal-Yam of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, and astronomer Douglas Leonard of San Diego State University used images from the Hubble Space Telescope to single out the star. In 1997 images, there was a bright light source near where the explosion, dubbed SN 2005gl, was detected in 2005.

In a previous paper Gal-Yam, Leonard and their colleagues had cited this evidence as indicative that the luminous, massive star begat the supernova. But without post-event images, it was not clear that the star had disappeared with the explosion or that the suspect light source had not been a cluster of stars to begin with. Thanks to 2007 Hubble images showing a void where the star (and subsequent supernova) had been, the researchers concluded that the solitary star indeed met its end in supernova SN 2005gl. They report their finding today in Nature.

Until very recently the only other supernova matched to its progenitor star with pre- and post-explosion images was SN 1987A in the nearby Large Magellanic Cloud. Just 168,000 light-years away, supernova SN 1987A was visible to the naked eye when it exploded in its namesake year. Then, in a paper published online by Science last week (that was submitted and accepted for publication after Gal-Yam and Leonard's paper), another pair of researchers identified two progenitor stars that disappeared in supernovae in 1993 and 2003.

Visible, x-ray and infrared image of a supernova remnant courtesy of NASA, ESA, R. Sankrit and W. Blair (Johns Hopkins University)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe