Rebel Republicans break rank to back House climate bill

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In a video posted on YouTube, Congressman Mark Kirk (R–Ill.) looks up from a 1300-page stack of papers and says, “I’m on page 587, reading about ‘Alternative Metrics and Threshold Review’ and I’ve got many more hours to go before the vote and a couple hundred more pages.” 

Apparently, the riveting read was enough to convince the Kirk and seven other Republicans to vote for the American Clean Energy and Security Act. The bill, backed by most Democrats and opposed by most Republicans, barely passed the House—219 to 212—late Friday. Next stop: the Senate, where an even tougher battle is expected.

The vote marks a first step toward a federal cap on climate-warming gases and encourages growth of the renewable energy sector. If the House bill becomes law, the target for U.S. greenhouse emissions in 2020 would be 17 percent below 2005 levels.

Who were the other renegade Republican congressmen who broke rank?

Leonard Lance was one of three New Jersey Republicans backing the bill. “Today’s legislation,” he said in a statement, “while not perfect, is a badly needed and long overdue step toward a national energy policy that reduces our dependence on foreign oil, ensure our national security and leads us on a path toward cleaner energy.”  The other two New Jersey Republicans voting for the bill were Chris Smith and Frank A. LoBiondo, who called for his state to grow its green industry.

Michael Castle (R–Del.) said in a statement that while he worried that Americans could face increases in their utility bills, he agonized "about the cost of doing nothing."  "Nations around the world are surging ahead with emission reductions and developing new energy technologies," he said, "The United States should be on equal footing, if not leading this effort to remain competitive."

Other GOP notables included Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Fla.), Mary Bono Mack (Calif.), John McHugh (N.Y.) and Tom Petri (Wisc.) who have backed environmental legislation in the past.

Finally, David Reichert (R–Wash.) whose Web site includes a photo of him in front of a snow-capped Mount Rainier reminded his constituency that, “Teddy Roosevelt was the true example of a Republican engaged in conserving resources for our children and grandchildren, but he also had the foresight to seek a brighter future for them.  Republicans must be at the table as we look for solutions in energy independence and preserving our environment.”

Image of elephant courtesy TheLizardQueen via Flickr

Brendan Borrell is a freelance journalist based in Brooklyn, New York. He writes for Bloomberg Businessweek, Nature, Outside, Scientific American, and many other publications, and is the co-author (with ecologist Manuel Molles) of the textbook Environment: Science, Issues, Solutions. He traveled to Brazil with the support of the Mongabay Special Reporting Initiative. Follow him on Twitter @bborrell.

More by Brendan Borrell

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe