Richardson died of brain bleed, medical examiner rules

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Actress Natasha Richardson, who died yesterday after a seemingly minor fall on a Canadian ski slope, was killed by blunt trauma to her head, a coroner said today.

Richardson, 45, died of an epidural hematoma, a bleed between the skull and the dura, the lining that covers the brain, New York's medical examiner ruled. Richardson was flown to New York, where she and her husband Liam Neeson, 56, have a home, after Monday's fall. Her death was ruled an accident.

“It can bleed profoundly, causing a clot that expands between the skull and the dura, and you get pressure on the brain,” David Langer, director of cerebrovascular neurosurgery at St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital in Manhattan, told the New York Times. “It can be quite dramatic. It’s one of the most acute neurological emergencies. It’s one of the few times where it’s life or death, where you can truly save somebody’s life, or they die if you don’t get to them.”

Richardson was walking and talking after she fell, but developed a pounding headache soon afterwards. Our Ask the Experts Q&A on talk-and-die syndrome explains more about this mystifying phenomenon.

Image of human brain © iStockphoto/Vasiliy Yakobchuk

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe