SEC may mandate corporate climate disclosures

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Just as Wal-Mart’s plan to start eco-labeling its products is splashing down into the summer corporate news kiddie pool, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is in talks about making companies do some serious environmental reporting of their own.

The SEC may eventually require all publicly traded companies to let consumers (that is, investors) know what kinds of risks—financial and otherwise—climate change may pose to the bottom line.

“It’s really time for us to take another very serious look at the disclosure system,” an SEC commissioner told Environment & Energy Publishing (via The New York Times). 

Investment groups had approached the SEC in June to discuss climate disclosure for companies. “What an investor is looking for is adequate information to make smart decisions,” president of eco-focused financial network Ceres, Mindy Lubber told the Associated Press at the time.

Some companies, however, maintain that the disclosures would be little more than a shot in the dark. “There are so many hypotheticals that you have to throw into the assumptions that I’m not sure how valid detailed cost reporting would be,” an American Electric Power spokesperson told the AP.

But the SEC has continued its discussion. “We have a lot of internal education to do,” Elisse Walter, one of the SEC commissioners told E&E. “This is obviously not an agency populated with climate experts.”

Earlier this year, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners drafted a similar recommendation, which, if adopted by states, requires large insurance groups to make climate risk information available to the public.  Many firms already keep tabs on such risks.

If the SEC settles on a similar mandate, the idea of which had been brushed off throughout the last administration, it could make some big waves, indeed.

Image courtesy of iStockphoto/ISerg

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe