Space shuttle lands safely in Florida

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Space shuttle Discovery touched down safely at 3:14 P.M. (Eastern Daylight Time) at Kennedy Space Center in Florida, completing its 13-day mission to the International Space Station (ISS). The landing time was pushed back from 1:39 P.M. due to uncertain weather at the landing site earlier in the day.

Discovery delivered a 45-foot (14-meter) truss segment to the ISS, completing the station's 335-foot (102-meter) "backbone," as well as the final set of solar arrays needed to power the station once its crew swells from three to six in the coming months. The ISS now boasts 38,400 square feet (3,570 square meters) of U.S. solar panels, nearly a full acre, generating about 120 kilowatts of electricity. (Unlike solar-powered buildings here on Earth, the space station doesn't need to worry about cloud cover.)

The shuttle also brought up a replacement unit to resurrect a faulty water-purification system on the ISS that filters urine to make potable water. Discovery is carrying samples from a test run of the urine processor for analysis on the ground before the residents of the station get the go-ahead to start drinking its output.

The shuttle mission, officially designated STS-119, was not without its quirks and glitches. Even its launch, which one NASA official characterized as "picture-perfect," appears to have cost one wayward bat its life. The creature was spotted pre-liftoff clinging to the shuttle's external fuel tank and was still hanging on as the engines lit and the shuttle cleared the tower.

Then there were the threats of space debris—one piece had NASA briefly considering an evasive maneuver for the ISS as the shuttle approached for docking, and another actually necessitated such a move while the shuttle and ISS were attached. Meanwhile, spacewalk activities were partly stymied by a stuck cargo platform intended to hold spare parts on future missions. After numerous attempts to swing the cargo carrier into position, the astronauts ultimately lashed it down, tabling the issue for a later date.

Landing aboard the shuttle were mission commander Lee Archambault, pilot Tony Antonelli, and mission specialists Joseph Acaba, John Phillips, Steve Swanson, Richard Arnold and Sandra Magnus. Magnus flew to the station on space shuttle Endeavour in November and has been replaced on the ISS by Japanese astronaut Koichi Wakata, who flew up with the Discovery crew.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe