Speaking in tongues--3,500 fewer, that is

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


There's a little bit of know-it-all Cheers postman Cliff Claven in all of us. So we were intrigued to learn of a little-known fact: Half of the planet's 7,000 languages are headed for extinction over the next century.

That phenomenon, the result of aging populations in regions made remote by terrain or migration, will be put on display on a small scale today, when speakers of 100 or more languages race to translate a speech by linguist K. David Harrison within 72 hours. He'll describe the endangered language problem at PopTech, a three-day conference of leaders in science, business, technology and the arts in Camden, Maine.

The vanishing language trend is "a stunning fact," says Harrison, an associate professor at Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania and author of the 2007 book When Languages Die. "We don’t even know what we're losing."

There are clues: Harrison draws a correlation between the decline in languages and species extinction. About 80 percent of plant and animal species are unclassified, partly because most scientists haven't bothered asking speakers of obscure languages about their environment and history that's been passed down only through oral — not written — traditions, he says. A nascent field, ethnobotany, addresses that problem by studying the relationship between people and plants.

"There are deep interconnections between ecosystems in collapse and climate change and languages in collapse," he says. "Knowledge about species resides in small languages, and it's knowledge science doesn’t have yet."

(Map of regions with high numbers of languages in danger of dying out, courtesy of Living Tongues Institute for Endangered Languages)

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe