Steven Chu calls for alt-energy "revolution"

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The world needs a "revolution" in science and technology to solve global warming, says Energy Secretary Steven Chu.

Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist, made the remarks in today's New York Times. The article was short on specifics, but Chu, former director of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, said Nobel-level breakthroughs were needed in electric batteries, solar power and crops that could be turned into fuel. "Science and technology can generate much better choices,” Chu, a long-time proponent of alternative energy development, told the newspaper. “It has, consistently, over hundreds and hundreds of years.”

Among the points he made:

The U.S. has to find a way to burn coal cleanly, especially since India and China won't stop using it. Scientists also need to look for new types of plants that don’t take much energy to grow and can be converted into clean, inexpensive alternatives to fossil fuels.

There may be alternatives to cap-and-trade (a federal program under which the government sets an overall limit on greenhouse gas emissions, and utilities that produce lower levels than allotted can sell their chits to those that fall short) as a means of curbing Earth-warming emissions. “The concern about cap-and-trade in today’s economic climate,” Chu said, “is that a lot of money might flow to developing countries in a way that might not be completely politically sellable.” Two possible alternatives: a modified cap-and-trade program or a tax on carbon emissions. Chu didn’t say how these systems might work, but he did say he supports pricing the carbon dioxide that invisibly billows from fossil fuel-fired power plants, factories and cars.

Chu wouldn't say if the Energy Department would open Yucca Mountain in Nevada for burial of radioactive waste if it gets permission from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. President Obama has expressed opposition to the controversial project, which Senate Majority Leader Harry Reed, a Democrat from Nevada, has been aggressively trying to derail.

Image of Energy Secretary Steven Chu/Department of Energy via Wikimedia

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe