The cell phone rings in its 25th year

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Remember when there were no cell phones? Hint: It was 25 years ago this month that the first commercial mobile call was made from the U.S., ushering in the era of constant communication.

Fittingly enough, Bob Barnett, then-president of Ameritech Mobile Communications, rang up the great-grandson of telephone inventor Alexander Graham Bell in Germany. Barnett placed the call on a so-called brick phone (a Motorola DynaTAC 8000X that weighed a hefty two pounds, was 13 inches long, and could only be used for 30 minutes of conversation) from a Chrysler convertible in the parking lot of Chicago's Soldier Field, according to the Wireless Association, the industry's Washington, D.C.-based trade group. It cost nearly $4,000, according to the Chicago Sun Times.

The first actual cell phone had been invented a decade earlier by Motorola's then-director of research Martin Cooper, who made the first-ever call on a handheld mobile in April 1973 from a Manhattan street corner to his counterpart Joel Engel at rival Bell Labs in New Jersey. It took another 10 years to get federal regulatory approval for a commercial version, airwaves allocated and to develop the technology to switch frequencies between call locations, according to Motorola. 

Since that fateful day, cell phones have become "small enough to be confused with a suppository," to quote a recent review in Gizmodo of the Haier Black Pearl, and cost as little as $40 each month. 

Now text messaging is eclipsing voice communication on cell phones: Carriers reported more than 384 billion texts in the first six months of this year, compared with 295 billion calls. And cameras, the Internet and GPS are becoming ubiquitous on mobile phones.

At the same time, scientists and industry are embroiled in a controversy over whether the devices cause brain tumors. That worry escalated 15 years ago when a Florida man appeared on CNN's Larry King Live, claiming that cell phone use had given his wife brain cancer. In July, a Pittsburgh cancer center warned its employees to limit their conversations on mobile phones, and to keep them away from children altogether. The Wireless Association insists the phones are safe.

We'll have to stay tuned for the verdict on mobile health, but for now, the phones are seen as a necessity by much of the planet: There are 3.3 billion cell phones in use on Earth, with 2.6 million subscribers in the U.S., according to the association. The U.S. is still trying to catch up to countries such as South Korea, though, where high-speed, broadband phone networks are the norm.

(Motorola "brick phone" via Flickr/yum9me, https://www.flickr.com/photos/yum9me/)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe