Trees boost air pollution--and cool temperatures--in U.S. Southeast

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Why is the southeastern U.S. getting cooler while the rest of the globe is warming? Thank the trees, say some researchers.

On sweltering summer days, trees and other plants emit volatile organic compounds, such as isoprene, which combine with manmade soot and other aerosols in the atmosphere to produce a cooling haze, says environmental scientist Allen Goldstein of the University of California, Berkeley.

Goldstein and his colleagues used satellite and ground sensor data to track air pollution. Over time, the cooling induced by the atmospheric haze has outpaced the warming due to rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, according to findings published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. "Nobody realized until now that enough of these aerosols were forming to influence cooling over an entire region," Goldstein says.

Of course, it would require a constant spew of aerosols to mimic the effect elsewhere (or on a global scale), enough to turn the sky gray instead of blue and make it difficult to breathe. So plant-produced haze isn’t likely to become a geoengineering solution anytime soon.

But the results go a long way to explain why high temperatures in the southeastern U.S. are dipping even as global CO2 levels rise. It isn't that there are more trees per se, it's that scientists now have better ways of measuring pollutants and their effect on local temperatures.

Image: © iStockphoto.com / Sebastien Windel

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe