Trees boost air pollution--and cool temperatures--in U.S. Southeast

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Why is the southeastern U.S. getting cooler while the rest of the globe is warming? Thank the trees, say some researchers.

On sweltering summer days, trees and other plants emit volatile organic compounds, such as isoprene, which combine with manmade soot and other aerosols in the atmosphere to produce a cooling haze, says environmental scientist Allen Goldstein of the University of California, Berkeley.

Goldstein and his colleagues used satellite and ground sensor data to track air pollution. Over time, the cooling induced by the atmospheric haze has outpaced the warming due to rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, according to findings published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. "Nobody realized until now that enough of these aerosols were forming to influence cooling over an entire region," Goldstein says.

Of course, it would require a constant spew of aerosols to mimic the effect elsewhere (or on a global scale), enough to turn the sky gray instead of blue and make it difficult to breathe. So plant-produced haze isn’t likely to become a geoengineering solution anytime soon.

But the results go a long way to explain why high temperatures in the southeastern U.S. are dipping even as global CO2 levels rise. It isn't that there are more trees per se, it's that scientists now have better ways of measuring pollutants and their effect on local temperatures.

Image: © iStockphoto.com / Sebastien Windel

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe