Trekkie triage: Could a new device aid medics?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On Star Trek, medical diagnoses were easy: Dr. McCoy pulled out a tricorder, and named a medical ailment without even laying a hand on a patient. Could a similar – albeit less powerful – device soon aid earth-bound medics?

From up to 40 feet away, the Standoff Patient Triage Tool (SPTT) would gauge a person’s pulse, body temperature and muscle movement, according to the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Science and Technology Directorate. The 15-by-8-by-6-inch (or about 38-by-20-by-15-centimeter) SPTT will use lasers to rapidly measure vibrations of objects such as the human head and chest and calculate vital signs from the data. Airplanes, acoustic speakers and landmine detectors already make use of such technology.

This could be particularly valuable for paramedics after rushing to a scene with multiple victims, says the DHS. Vital signs help such first responders rank the severity of victims’ conditions. But this hands-on sorting of who needs to be treated first – the process called triage – can be time-consuming and difficult; every minute lost may be the difference between life and death. The new technology, notes the DHS, could do in 30 seconds what typically takes a medic three to five minutes per person.

And objective numbers aren’t the only factors in these decisions. “Human nature is to pay attention to the person who is screaming and bleeding, but someone else with a less obvious internal injury may need to be the first priority,” said Greg Price of DHS S&T in a statement. He sees the SPTT eliminating some of those biases. Price's team and their collaborators from the Technical Support Working Group, Boeing and Washington University’s School of Medicine, expect field tests of the SPTT – whose price they haven't settled on yet – to begin this fall.

We did a bit of a checkup with ER docs to find out whether this was a good prescription for care. Lewis Goldfrank, director of emergency medical services at New York City’s Bellevue Hospital, sees great potential for the tool. “A 30-second triage and remote vitals monitoring could prove to be the paradigm breakthrough for both healthcare personnel and the current state of science,” he told ScientificAmerican.com in an email. “Technology has advanced drastically and utilizing SPTT could prove itself to be an effective manner to survey those ‘silent’ cases within a triage facility, emergency department, hospital or during a disaster.”

Still, it may be too soon for the handheld machine to replace up close and personal medical attention, cautions Goldfrank's Bellevue and New York University School of Medicine colleague Christopher Mcstay. He notes key vital signs, including blood pressure and oxygen saturation, not included in the machine’s repertoire. “The technology is not ready for prime time now,” says McStay, “but I can see its potential for future applications.”

The tricorder-like device may not be the only science fiction-inspired tool you hear about in the near future. A number of sci-fi novelists attended the DHS directorate's annual Stakeholders Conference last month. “Boldly going where few government bureaucracies have gone before, the agency is enlisting the expertise of science fiction writers,” reported The Washington Post, adding that the novelists “consult pro bono.”

Image of Star Trek "tricorder" courtesy of Diamond Select Toys via Flickr

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe