Urine test predicts smokers' lung cancer risk

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Quick to light up despite the potential risks? Take note: there may be a way to rapidly predict your chances of developing lung cancer – and provide yet more incentive to kick the habit. Researchers have discovered that smokers who excrete high levels of two tobacco metabolites (chemicals produced when the body breaks down tobacco) in their urine are up to 8.5 times more likely than those who excrete low levels to develop lung cancer.

"If we can identify a smoker with a high level of metabolites, and down the road they have a higher risk of lung cancer, public health workers can get them motivated to quit smoking,” lead researcher Jian-Min Yuan, a cancer epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, told Bloomberg News.

Yuan and his team studied the urine chemicals in 491 smokers participating in the Shanghai Cohort Study and the Singapore Chinese Health Study, 246 of whom developed lung cancer during a 10-year follow-up. Suspecting that a tobacco metabolite called 4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL), which triggers lung cancer in lab animals but whose effect on humans is unknown, would be a good predictor of lung cancer, the scientists divided study subjects into three groups: those with high, medium and low NNAL levels.

They found that smokers with the highest NNAL levels in their urine were twice as likely as those with the lowest amounts to develop lung cancer. When the researchers included a second metabolite called cotinine in their analysis, they found that those with the highest levels of both NNAL and cotinine in their urine were 8.5 times more likely to develop the disease.

A standard urine metabolite test for smokers would probably cost $100 to $120 and take a few years to develop, Yuan told HealthDay News, but he is optimistic that the use of such a test would push at-risk smokers to stop.  

Tobacco use leads to 440,000 deaths in the US every year, according to the American Cancer Society. The org notes that one in four Americans continues to puff away even though smoking is the No. 1 cause of cancer deaths in the U.S.

porcelaingirl° {è un triangolo isoscele} via Flickr

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe