U.S. health officials: All school-age children should get flu shots

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


As flu season  fast approaches, U.S. health officials are urging all children between the ages of six months and 18 years of age to get flu shots. The recommendation expands the previously targeted population (infants, people 50 and over, those with chronic illnesses and compromised immune systems) to include all school-age kids.

"Flu is very transmissible in school," said Julie Gerberding, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in issuing the call for some 30 million more U.S. children to get the flu vaccine. "This is truly an effort not only to improve the individual health of children but to affect the population of children as they congregate in schools and day care."

The new advisory, supported by the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases and the American Academy of Pediatrics, is designed to reduce missed school days (and work days for parents) and to cut down on the use of antibiotics to treat influenza. The height of the flu season runs from December to March, but health officials say people should start getting vaccinated  as soon as possible.

Recent reports indicate that there's a surfeit of flu vaccines available this year. "Given the robust supply, the emphasis this year is get out there and get protected," Gerberding said at a news conference.  "And for sure, protect your children."

According to the agency, some 5 percent to 20 percent  of the U.S. population (15 million to 60 million) come down with the flu annually; about 200, 000, including 20,000 children, are hospitalized for symptoms and as many as 36,000 mostly elderly die from flu-related complications. During the 2007-to-2008 flu season, however, the CDC reported that 86 children died from the flu, half of them between the ages of 15 and 17.

A study published last year in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that seniors who received the shot had a 48 percent reduced risk of getting the flu and a 27 percent reduced risk of being hospitalized from the flu or pneumonia.

"The message for most people is get your flu shot," Gerberding said. "It's an advantage to you or someone you care about."

The worst ever flu pandemic in 1918 killed an estimated 20 million to 40 million people worldwide, including  between  500,000 to 675,000 people in the U.S.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe