Virgin biofuelled flight: T-minus one month and counting...

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Richard Branson plans to send one of his 747-400 planes across the Channel between London and Amsterdam on a mix of 20 percent mystery biofuel and 80 percent conventional jet fuel. The test flight will mark the first time a conventional airliner flies on any amount of biofuel, though the exact biofuel will not be named by Virgin anytime soon. Clues include: sustainable (i.e. not palm oil), won't compete with food (i.e. not soy or canola), and won't deplete fresh water resources (i.e. is already being grown with wastewater or soon will be.) Not a lot of fuels presently available fit that bill: algae springs to mind as a feedstock as does UOP's "green diesel", as outlined in my new web feature on the subject. But the flight itself will mark an epochal change in airplane fuel. The U.S. Air Force is flying on reformed fossil fuels (coal to liquid) and a smaller jet has flown on 100 percent biodiesel. The challenge is not the flight itself, it's incorporating this mystery biofuel into the entire air travel infrastructure.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe