Walden Pond, Yellowstone species dying out

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Just in time to tug at your patriotic heartstrings, newly published research shows that the American icons Walden Pond and Yellowstone National Park are losing treasured plant and animal life to climate change and fungus.

Two studies in this week’s Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences document the disappearance of species in and around Massachusetts’ Walden Pond – made famous by naturalist Henry David Thoreau 156 years ago – and in Yellowstone in Wyoming.

Flowers vulnerable to rising temperatures, including buttercups, dogwoods, lilies, orchids, roses and violets, are dying out on Walden Pond, according to one of the studies, which is part of an ongoing effort to monitor the species first recorded by Thoreau. Some 25 percent, or 120 of the 473 species Thoreau documented, have vanished, and 34 percent, or 156, may face imminent extinction, says study author Charles Davis, a Ph.D. candidate in organismic and evolutionary biology at Harvard. Temperatures near Walden have risen 4.3 degrees Fahrenheit (2.4 degrees Celsius) over the past century and are expected to go up between 2 degrees and 11.5 degrees Fahrenheit (1.1 degrees and 6.4 degrees Celsius) over the next 100 years, according to the study.

"Species that can't cue in to erratic seasonality are having a harder time — it's an inability to synch your flowering time with temperature changes," Davis tells us.

In just 16 years, the number of permanently dry ponds in Yellowstone has quadrupled, the second study says: 19 of 49 that were full in 1992 and 1993 were dry last year, Discovery News notes. During that same time, more than half of the amphibian populations that rely on the ponds disappeared. Two frog species -- the boreal chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata maculata) and the Columbia spotted frog (Rana luteiventris) – the boreal toad (Bufo boreas boreas), and the blotched tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum) were affected, BBC News reports.

Previous research showed that amphibians are disappearing faster than any other organisms. Changes in their habitat pose the biggest threat; the parasitic fungus amphibian chytrid has also been blamed. 

"This is really catastrophic to the local amphibian population, because obviously they need these environments to breed and exist as larvae," Sarah McMenamin, a Stanford University biology doctoral candidate and author of the second study, told Discovery News. Add fungus to that mix, she said, and "It's a triple whammy on the amphibians."

(Image of lone water lilly on Walden Pond via Flickr/Sage, https://www.flickr.com/photos/vickispix/)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe