War recedes, but turns crueler

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The world is getting to be a more peaceful place. In the last 10 years, conflicts in Angola, Sierra Leone, Democratic Republic of Congo, Nepal, Kosovo, East Timor, Liberia, to name just a few have been resolved, notes Jan Egeland, former emergency relief coordinator at the U.N. But at the same time, those wars that still drag on or burst to life—Colombia, Darfur, Iraq—are proving more intractable and more cruel. Egeland argues that wars have turned crueler simply because the majority of them are not being waged between nations, rather they are civil and internecine wars. "Civil wars are crueler because they are fought amongst civilian populations," he said. And although the U.N. is doing a good job of keeping people fed during such violence, according to Egeland, the international community is not doing a good job of protecting people after they have been fed, a lesson unlearned even after similar massacres in Bosnia in the 1990s. Nor are those places outside the English-speaking world, such as French- and Portuguese-speaking African nations, receiving the help they need. Technology helps these conflicts persist; Egeland showed a picture of a soldier in the northern Ugandan Lord's Resistance Army—wreaking havoc via kidnapped child soldiers since 1987—powering an untraceable satellite phone with solar photovoltaic cells. The problem of war can be solved, Egeland insists, despite the centuries of failure that refute him. "It's a question of political will." Whether that political will can be mustered or not, climate change and other environmental problems may undo the peace work of the last several decades. To take the current genocide in Darfur: over the last 30 years farmers had taken up more and more of the available land in that dry region, living in an uneasy peace with nomadic herders, according to Andrew Morton, a program manager for the U.N. Environment Programme. As rains became even more sporadic, the two groups came into conflict over diminishing resources, a conflict that spiraled out of control beginning in 2003. With more climate changes in store, the problem of environmental wars could spiral out of control, too.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe