What does Barack Obama's brain look like?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Barack Obama still has a month before his inauguration as the 44th U.S. president, but there have already been a number of attempts to get inside his brain. For some, that might mean Karen Kornbluh, his chief policy director. But for us here at Scientific American, that means his actual brain.

So we were happy to see Jonah Lehrer [pictured, left] offer some of his own brain’s thoughts on our next president’s brain in Sunday’s New York Times Magazine. In the interview, Lehrer -- the editor of SciAm.com’s Mind Matters column—touches on the tendency to stand by our beliefs even in the face of evidence to the contrary. That’s a key theme of Lehrer’s new book, How We Decide, which unravels the latest neuroscience research on the complex emotional and (sometimes) rational forces that interact to influence our decisions.

The tendency to get stuck to beliefs is especially worrying when it affects politicians’ decision making, but Lehrer credits president-elect Obama with having a nuanced understanding of the human mind’s potential pitfalls. Obama, he says, is especially skilled at thinking about thinking: “I imagine that if you took a scan of his brain, you would see lots of activity in the prefrontal cortex, which doesn’t mean that he doesn’t experience the primal emotions that come from the amygdala.”

If you’re curious about the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala, among other issues, Lehrer has covered a number of topics he discusses in the Times interview in depth in Mind Matters: animal cognition, why we gamble and abuse credit cards, and the dangers of our built-in certainty bias. Some of those columns appear in the print edition of Scientific American Mind.

Can’t decide which of those links to click on first? Lehrer may be able to help you with that.

photo of Jonah Lehrer by Nina Subin

About Karen Schrock

Kate Schrock has been an editor of Scientific American MIND since 2007, where she edits feature articles and runs Head Lines, the magazine's news department. After studying astronomy and physics at the University of Southern California, she worked in the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging at the University of California, Los Angeles, studying the brain structure of people with schizophrenia. She then enrolled in the Science, Health and Environmental Reporting program at New York University, where she earned a master's degree in journalism.

More by Karen Schrock

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe