Will Stephen Colbert get his space module? The suspense ends tonight

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The long-simmering standoff between Stephen Colbert and NASA comes to an end tonight, when the space agency unveils its name for a new International Space Station (ISS) module on the Colbert Report.

To recap: NASA is expanding the ISS later this year with the addition of its Node 3, a module that will house life-support systems and a robotic-arm command station with a panoramic observatory. But Node 3 isn't the snappiest moniker, so the space agency set up an online poll where people could vote for their fave name from a list or write in a candidate of their own.

Colbert, who has already sent his digitized DNA to the space station and revels in calling on Colbert Nation to engage in online gate-crashing, unabashedly directed his viewers to stuff the virtual ballot box with votes for "Colbert." The effort worked—"Colbert" beat the top NASA-suggested vote getter, "Serenity," by more than 40,000 votes. But with the polls closed, NASA demurred on its intentions regarding the nonbinding results, even reportedly floating the idea of naming an ISS toilet for Colbert instead.

Apparently enjoying the PR boost, NASA is sending astronaut Sunita Williams, an ISS veteran, onto the Colbert Report to announce the new name. "I certainly hope NASA does the right thing," Colbert said in a statement. "Just kidding, I hope they name it after me."

Photo credit: David Shankbone via Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe