With Daschle out, who will Obama tap to run HHS?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Who will President Obama pick as health secretary to replace first choice Tom Daschle, who bowed out after being hit for failing to pay more than $120,000 in taxes?

Not sure, say news reports, noting that the new administration was so certain the former South Dakota senator – a close Obama adviser and friend —- had the job wrapped up that there were no other names on the table. “There was no Plan B,” senior Obama adviser David Axelrod tells the New York Times today. “Our intent was that he would serve.”

The Times and The New Republic quote Democratic sources as saying that the administration is considering several Democratic governors for the post. Among them: Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas, an early Obama supporter and previously her state’s insurance commissioner, Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania, Jennifer Granholm of Michigan, and former Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber, who was an emergency room doctor.

Daschle, who authored the 2008 book Critical: What We can Do About the Healthcare Crisis, was actually up for two slots: HHS secretary and head of a new White House Office of Health Reform. The latter was to function as a kind of health-reform czar, coordinating efforts across government to revamp the nation’s health system. Its deputy, Jeanne Lambrew, an associate professor of public affairs at the University of Texas in Austin and coauthor of Daschle's tome, may be tapped for the top spot there, according to the Times.

Obama made health care a prominent theme of his campaign. How will Daschle’s withdrawal affect reform of the U.S. health-care system? “Daschle had a direct line to Obama, a result of the relatively long relationship the two men had. That gave the health team clout. And clout matters at a time when, inevitably, budget resources are going to be scarce--and legislative priorities are still not definitive,” Jonathan Cohn writes in TNR. “At the very least, a planning process that was not only well underway but starting to near completion will now have to go on hold, at least for a little while, as the administration cleans up the damage of this mess.”

Bonus: We asked our Twitter followers this morning whom they thought should get the job. Some responses: Ohio Democratic Rep. Dennis Kucinich, pediatrician-turned-Vermont governor-turned Democratic National Committee chair Howard Dean, surgeon and New Yorker staff writer Atul Gawande, and Ezekiel Emanuel. Emanuel, for those of you don’t know, is a bioethicist at the NIH, and the brother of White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image © iStockphoto/Mustafa Deliormanli

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe