Russia border dispute: Woolly mammoth is American, not Siberian

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


What a long, strange evolutionary trip. The last of the woolly mammoths had North American, not Asian roots, new science suggests.

Many scientists thought the woolly mammoths -- relatives of the elephant -- represented one large population that spanned the Bering Land Bridge between present-day Alaska and Siberia.

Some of those mammoths crossed from Siberia into North America 200,000 years ago. Now, DNA analysis of woolly mammoth fossils shows that from 40,000 to 10,000 years ago, all of the beasts in Siberia showed North American genetic fingerprints, indicating that a cataclysmic event wiped out the species' Siberian predecessors. The findings, based on analysis of 160 remains from North America, Europe and Asia, are in today's Cell Biology.

"That we find such complete disappearance of the early Siberian groups is pretty remarkable," said Ross MacPhee, curator of vertebrate zoology at the American Museum of Natural History, who co-authored the paper. "It sounds like something really bad happened around 40,000 years ago that resulted in their collapse on that continent. It’s a strange and provocative finding."

Another author, Hendrik Poinar of McMaster University, said in a news release that the discovery suggests that woolly mammoths migrated across the Bering Land Bridge earlier than previously thought, then returned to Siberia to replace the older population.

Still unknown is how other species changed during the extinction of the Siberian woolly mammoth, MacPhee said.

"If we knew more about some of these other Ice Age species, we might know more about why these losses occurred in the first place," he said. "It's one of the biggest puzzles in extinction biology." (Image courtesy of American Museum of Natural History/D. Finin)

 

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe