Your guide to the Oscars--Or at least the science of the Oscars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The 81st Annual Academy Awards are tonight, and science would be in the running for best supporting theme—if there was an Oscar for that kind of thing.

As we pointed out in a post a month ago, there's a lot of science in the Oscar contenders this year. (Here's our in-depth report on science at the movies.) First there's The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,up for 13 awards, whose premise is that humans can reverse the aging process. It's certainly an arresting idea, arresting the progress of aging, but a few experts we spoke to in December about the film called it, well, not entirely realistic.

Then there's The Dark Knight, which garnered eight Oscar nominations, including one for best actor in a supporting role for the late Heath Ledger. In our most viewed story of last year, Paul Zehr, an associate professor of kinesiology and neuroscience and author of Becoming Batman: The Possibility of a Superhero, explained why Batman could exist—but not for long.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Other nominees with a heavy dose of science: Iron Man (for visual effects and sound editing), Wall-E (six nominations, including for best animated feature film and original screenplay, and Encounters at the End of the World (best documentary feature). For background on these films while you watch the Oscars, check out a real-life robotic suit, more on other kinds of robots, and what it's like to do research in Antarctica.

There are also, of course, awards for the science of the movies, the Academy's Sci-Tech Awards. Those go to achievements such as "efforts toward identifying and solving the problem of High-Speed Emulsion Stress Syndrome in motion picture film stock" (Jonathan Erland) and "innovative algorithms and refined adaptations of published methods to achive large-scale water effects" (Doug Roble, Nafees Bin Zafar, and Ryo Sakaguchi). That ceremony was separately from tonight's, on February 9. (Imagine waiting for presenting actors to make their ways through lines like that!)

There isn't really much science in Oscar favorite Slum Dog Millionaire, although the movie certainly shines a spotlight on sanitation, a subject we tackled last year, in Mumbai's poorest—and most crowded—areas.

Tune in tonight at 8 P.M. Eastern time to find out how science fares. Just watch how you make the popcorn.

Image courtesy of nancycallahan via Flickr

Ivan Oransky is editor in chief of Spectrum and a distinguished writer in residence at New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute. He is a co-founder of Retraction Watch and a volunteer member of the board of directors of the PubPeer Foundation.

More by Ivan Oransky

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe