Baby Spiders Are Braver When Their Parents Are Around

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


As an individual who is part of a social species, you are likely aware of how others’ behaviour can influence your own and how you can influence others. This influence can be through a direct interaction, for example a single persuasive person can determine the verdict of a jury. One or two aggressive people can cause a crowd to turn violent. A single comedian can break the ice and make a room full of strangers relaxed and comfortable around each other. 

However, people also influence each other’s behaviour indirectly just by their presence. For example, you may behave differently whether you are in the presence of your friends, parents, co-workers, boss, or partner.

Within any group of animals (including humans), there may be particular individuals, so-called ‘keystone’ individuals, that have a disproportionately large effect on the other individuals around them. Of course, whether an individual is a keystone individual will depend on which environment it is in and who else is in the group of individuals it is with.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Evidently humans are not the only species whose behaviour is affected by other individuals. For example, crickets dance differently depending on who’s watching them, and cleaner fish provide a better service for their clients when there are other clients watching.  

Group-living animals can also have keystone individuals who change the dynamics of that group. For example, many spiders live in groups. The social spider Stegodyphus dumicola lives in colonies (which can have several hundred individuals) where they cooperate in their capture of prey, building of a web and care of young. When catching prey, a few bold individuals can lead the way and then many other individuals join in subduing the poor victim.

Andreas Modlmeier and colleagues from the University of Pittsburgh recently carried out an experiment in South Africa with these social spiders and found that the behaviour of young spiders was affected by the presence of adults.   

The researchers collected juvenile spiders and put them in either smaller or larger groups, with adults either being present or absent. They were put in containers and allowed to build a web.  They then dropped a cricket into the web and observed the spiders’ behaviour.

They found that when adults were present in a group, the group was much more likely to attack than groups where the juveniles were alone. This was especially the case in large groups. Interestingly, this is not because the adults were the ones who first attacked the prey; merely their presence seemed to stimulate the juveniles to attack faster.

So why might the presence of adults affect the juvenile’s willingness to attack prey? One possibility is that adults alert juveniles to the presence of the prey. However, it is also possible that the juveniles are just hungrier when there are adults present, as the adults have been eating the majority of the food the colony has had up until this point.

Either way, this experiment shows that when we’re looking at the behaviour of a social species, it’s important to take into account not only whether the individual is in a group or not, but specifically which individuals are around, as this can clearly affect behaviour

Reference

Modlmeier et al. (2015). Adult presence augments juvenile collective foraging in social spiders. Animal Behaviour109, 9-14.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe