Dogs Follow the Gaze of Humans, Especially When There’s Food Involved

I recently wrote about how humans and other primates follow the gaze of others. This week I read about two more interesting findings relating to gaze-following, the first in dogs, the second in robins.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I recently wrote about how humans and other primates follow the gaze of others. This week I read about two more interesting findings relating to gaze-following, the first in dogs, the second in robins.

The first study used forty family-owned dogs. The researchers wanted half of these dogs to think that there was food hidden in the room they were going to be tested in, so they hid four pieces of food under pots in the room. The owner then came in with their dog and walked around the room, lifting the pots to show their dog where the food was and letting them eat it. Thus, the dogs were trained to expect to find food hidden in the room.

In the second part of the experiment, the owner came back with their dog, but this time there were no pots with food hidden. Instead, they faced the experimenter who stood between two barriers (which didn't actually have food behind them, but the dog didn't know this). The owner held the dog in place while the experimenter stared at one of the barriers for 30 seconds. Eighty percent of these dogs looked in the same direction as the researcher had been staring. What's more, the dogs actually gazed behind the barrier, as if expecting there to be food hiding there.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The other twenty dogs were tested in the same way, but without the experience of getting food first. Thus these dogs were not trained to expect to find food in the test room. This time only fifty-five percent of the dogs looked in the same direction as the experimenter, and those that did looked at the barrier rather than to what might be hidden behind it (kind of like the difference between staring at a blacked out car windshield and trying to stare through the windshield to see what might be behind it).

So it seems that dogs are very good at following human gaze, to the extent that if they think food might be hidden behind or in something they will actually stare through the object in question, leaving absolutely no ambiguity as to what they want.

 

Photo Credits

First dog: Phoebe Schwartz

Second dog: João Paulo Corrêa de Carvalho

 

Reference

MET, A., MIKLÓSI, Á. & LAKATOS, G. (2014) Gaze-following behind barriers in domestic dogs. Animal Cognition, online first. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0754-z

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe