Dogs Follow the Gaze of Humans, Especially When There’s Food Involved

I recently wrote about how humans and other primates follow the gaze of others. This week I read about two more interesting findings relating to gaze-following, the first in dogs, the second in robins.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I recently wrote about how humans and other primates follow the gaze of others. This week I read about two more interesting findings relating to gaze-following, the first in dogs, the second in robins.

The first study used forty family-owned dogs. The researchers wanted half of these dogs to think that there was food hidden in the room they were going to be tested in, so they hid four pieces of food under pots in the room. The owner then came in with their dog and walked around the room, lifting the pots to show their dog where the food was and letting them eat it. Thus, the dogs were trained to expect to find food hidden in the room.

In the second part of the experiment, the owner came back with their dog, but this time there were no pots with food hidden. Instead, they faced the experimenter who stood between two barriers (which didn't actually have food behind them, but the dog didn't know this). The owner held the dog in place while the experimenter stared at one of the barriers for 30 seconds. Eighty percent of these dogs looked in the same direction as the researcher had been staring. What's more, the dogs actually gazed behind the barrier, as if expecting there to be food hiding there.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The other twenty dogs were tested in the same way, but without the experience of getting food first. Thus these dogs were not trained to expect to find food in the test room. This time only fifty-five percent of the dogs looked in the same direction as the experimenter, and those that did looked at the barrier rather than to what might be hidden behind it (kind of like the difference between staring at a blacked out car windshield and trying to stare through the windshield to see what might be behind it).

So it seems that dogs are very good at following human gaze, to the extent that if they think food might be hidden behind or in something they will actually stare through the object in question, leaving absolutely no ambiguity as to what they want.

 

Photo Credits

First dog: Phoebe Schwartz

Second dog: João Paulo Corrêa de Carvalho

 

Reference

MET, A., MIKLÓSI, Á. & LAKATOS, G. (2014) Gaze-following behind barriers in domestic dogs. Animal Cognition, online first. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0754-z

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe