Emotional bees

Whether animals feel emotion, and are capable of suffering, is a question the answer to which has far-reaching implications. I recently read Victoria Braithwaite's `Do Fish Feel Pain?', a question that I didn't worry about much until reading this book, but now bothers me a lot more.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Whether animals feel emotion, and are capable of suffering, is a question the answer to which has far-reaching implications. I recently read Victoria Braithwaite’s ‘Do Fish Feel Pain?’, a question that I didn’t worry about much until reading this book, but now bothers me a lot more. This book raised a number of quandaries I had previously not considered. One of the most pertinent of these was the measures we deem necessary for an animal’s welfare, particularly in farming practices, and how these are determined by how much we think the animal in question is capable of suffering. The ability to suffer is something that is difficult to quantify, and instead of going into details here I’d recommend reading this illuminating book instead. However, one way in which we do measure the ability to suffer is that once an animal experiences an unpleasant event it has lasting effects on that animal’s outlook on the world. For example, we know in humans that a negative event (such as pain or fear) causes a pessimistic cognitive bias, so that events after this that might usually be seen as neutral or even positive, are now viewed in a negative light.

Cognitive biases have also been found in animals like rats, dogs, sheep and starlings but until recently no one had looked to see if any invertebrate had them, presumably because we assumed that, of course, insects don’t experience pessimism or suffering. However, in a recent study published1, Bateson and her colleagues looked to see just this- would bees show a pessimistic outlook after experiencing a negative event?

Bees, whilst having their own remarkable communication system, unfortunately cannot talk to us, and so the first hurdle to overcome in an experiment like this is to know how to judge when a bee is being pessimistic in a situation. Luckily, bees are known for being great at learning, so the scientists trained bees to associate a particular odour with a sugar reward, to which they would stick their proboscis out to eat. After training the bees to associate these two things, the bees would then stick their proboscis out when they smelled that particular odour, even when there was no honey reward to follow. The bees were also trained to associate another odour with a negative outcome (instead of a high concentration sugar solution, they were given a low-concentration sugar solution or quinine which doesn’t taste very nice to bees).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

After the bees were trained that one odour lead to a good reward, whereas the other odour lead to ‘punishment’ (its hard to imagine quinine being that bad, but pretend for a moment you’re a bee), they either were left undisturbed, or they were exposed to a negative experience. This negative experience was being put into a bottle and being shaken, as might happen if the bee were attacked by a predator.

These bees were then exposed to the odours as before, but now in different mixtures varying from the first odour, an equal mix of the first and second odour, through to the second odour alone. The bees that had been shaken up responded much more negatively to the odour that predicted a negative outcome than did the bees that hadn’t been shaken. Interestingly, this effect was much greater for the negative stimulus (the second odour by itself) rather than the ambiguous one, unlike what was found in studies with vertebrates.

Nevertheless, it does seem that these bees which were shaken definitely seemed to avoid the ‘bad’ odour more than the other bees. Whether this really shows that bees are capable of having a ‘glass half-empty’ outlook on the world in the same way that humans do is unknown, but it definitely leaves room for discussion.

Bateson et al. 2011 Agitated Honeybees Exhibit Pessimistic Cognitive Biases. Current Biology 21, 1070-1073.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe