Left-Eyed Fish Are Faster Learners

You may have heard the claim that left-handed people are smarter than right handed people. Specifically, it seems that left-handed people are over represented in musicians, architects and art and music students.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


You may have heard the claim that left-handed people are smarter than right handed people. Specifically, it seems that left-handed people are over represented in musicians, architects and art and music students. Why this might be isn’t entirely clear, but it is possible that it has something to do with the left-handed brain being larger and having greater connectivity than the right-handed brain.

The reason some people are left-handed while others are right-handed is because of brain lateralization: the division of the brain into two hemispheres. However, we're not the only animals that have brain lateralization; many animals have a preference for using either their right or left leg, paw, eye, foot, or ear, for example. Cats are generally right-pawed, dogs are pretty evenly split between being left- or right-pawed, while wall lizards are generally left-eyed.

However, how does being right- or left-haded/eyed/eared actually affect how we think? A recent study looked into this using the rainbow fish. Using wild and captive individuals of this Australian fish, the researchers looked to see if whether the fish was left- or right- eyed would affect it’s ability to learn. Left-eyed fish turned out to be faster learners than right-eyed fish. Also, fish that were hatched in the wild tended to be faster learners than captive-bred fish. Whether the fish was male or female had no effect on their ability to learn.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Why it might be that the left-eyed fish are faster learners isn’t entirely clear. Hopefully more studies of this type with other animals will help us gain a greater understanding of what exactly is going on.

 

 

Photo Credits

Jimi Hendrix statue: Bleachers

Rainbowfish: Roan Art

 

Reference

Bibost, A. L., & Brown, C. (2014). Laterality influences cognitive performance in rainbowfish Melanotaenia duboulayi. Animal cognition, online first. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0734-3

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe