10 Scientists among 2011 MacArthur Foundation "Genius Grant" Winners

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Twenty-two individuals will soon each be a half-million dollars richer, having won this year's so-called genius grants. The MacArthur Foundation announced its 2011 fellows September 20, a mix of scientists, artists, musicians and others selected "for their creativity, originality, and potential to make important contributions in the future," according to a prepared statement from the foundation. The five-year grant is open to any citizen or resident of the U.S. and comes with no strings attached.

Ten of the 22 recipients work in the sciences. Among the winners are sports medicine researcher Kevin Guskiewicz [left], 45, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, who spoke with Scientific American in 2008 about his research on the long-term effects of football concussions, and physicist Markus Greiner [right], 38, of Harvard University, who drew our attention in 2002 when he and his colleagues coaxed a collection of ultracold atoms known as a Bose–Einstein condensate into a new type of matter.

And a 2006 article on the development of expertise made mention of research on underperforming schools by new MacArthur fellow Roland Fryer [left], 34, a Harvard economist.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Also honored were Harvard clinical psychologist Matthew Nock [right], 38, whose studies of suicide and other kinds of self-harm were part of our 2010 feature on the psychology of suicide, and neurologist William Seeley [left], 39, of the University of California, San Francisco, whose work has been featured in two Scientific American articles on the neurobiology of self and on the interplay of dementia and personality.

Other 2011 genius grantees in the sciences include:

  • Parasitologist and virologist Elodie Ghedin, 44, of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, who uses "genomic sequencing techniques to generate critical insights about human pathogens," according to the MacArthur Foundation;

  • Evolutionary geneticist Sarah Otto, 43, of the University of British Columbia, who explores "fundamental questions of population genetics and evolution, such as why some species reproduce sexually and why some species carry more than one copy of each gene";

  • Sensor technologist and computer scientist Shwetak Patel, 29, of the University of Washington, who "invented a series of sensor technology systems for home environments with the goal of saving energy and improving daily life through a broad range of applications";

  • Organometallic chemist Melanie Sanford, 36, of the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, who is "reviving and enhancing approaches to organic synthesis previously set aside because of their technical difficulty"; and

  • Developmental Biologist Yukiko Yamashita, 39, of the University of Michigan Medical School, who works to uncover "the biochemical, structural, and molecular genetic mechanisms that regulate stem cell division."

All photos courtesy the John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe