3 Ingredients Make Good July 4th Fireworks [Video]

How different types of chemicals combine for a holiday blast.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A trio of components make for the best Fourth of July fireworks displays. Safety and a clear night sky should be two of them. But that's a different kind of list. The chemistry behind the biggest and brightest bangs involves another threesome: Oxidizers, fuel, and colors. That's the gospel according to John A. Conkling, a chemist at Washington College in Maryland who wrote the book on fiery displays. (He really did, and it is called The Chemistry of Pyrotechnics: Basic Principles and Theory, now in its second edition.) This week Conkling described how these three ingredients combine in a holiday blast for the American Chemical Society's Reactions blog:

Oxidizers are chemicals that carry oxygen, needed to power a high-heat reaction. Potassium nitrate, in a black powder, is a common one for fireworks. They combine with fuel, the second component, to release that heat. Sulfur can serve as a fireworks fuel, as can charcoal, Conkling says. But the real fun comes with the third ingredient, chemicals that produce colors. "Different chemical elements, heated to high temperatures, get rid of that energy by emitting very different wavelengths of light," he says. If you want a very nice blue flame color, copper oxide is a good choice, Conkling says. Strontium chloride will give you a good red. And calcium nitrate "makes a nice yellow-orange."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Safety is on his list too, says Conkling, who wears protective glasses when handling these compounds. Pretty things that blow up command respect.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe