5-Armed Brittle Stars Always Face Front

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


How would you walk if you had five arms and no brains? If you're a brittle star, the answer turns out to be quite well (for an echinoderm)—although it's a little complicated.

The blunt-spined brittle star (Ophiocoma echinata) looks like a claymation creature from an alien horror movie as it moves its disk-like body along the sea floor with unexpected agility. It was this creepy crawl that captivated graduate student Henry Astley, who couldn't quite figure out how the animal was coordinating its movements. "It was too confusing," he said in a prepared statement. "There's no obvious front. There are five arms that are moving, and I'm trying to keep track of all five while the disk was moving."

Animals with two matching sides (bilateral symmetry, as in humans, as well as most other animals) have a leg or fin up in terms of coordinating movement, compared with organisms that are radially symmetrical, such as the brittle star or jellyfish. Unlike brittle stars, jellyfish solve the problem of lacking a "front" by moving along a central axis (think up and down), rather than picking one direction among their equal sides.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Each of a brittle star's legs can sense light, chemical and tactile stimuli, so some scientists have proposed that each limb might be moving based on its own local senses rather than being controlled centrally and coordinated with the other limbs for a unified crawl (a robot brittle star has already been built based on this model). But that didn't seem like a very practical way to run a whole organism.

So Astley, an evolutionary biology graduate student at Brown University, studied 13 blunt-spined brittle stars as they moved across sand on the bottom of an inflatable pool for several trials each. How do you motivate an echinoderm to move when you want it to? Wide open spaces. "They hate being exposed," Astley said. "So we put them in the middle of this sandy area, and they'd move."

After analyzing the movement of each leg from videotape, Astley found that these animals were moving like bilateral animals, but were randomly switching their "front" whenever they changed direction.

"Even though their bodies are radially symmetrical, they can define a front and basically behave as if they're bilaterally symmetrical," Astley said. This allows them to be flexible in choosing direction while also taking advantage of streamlined two-way symmetry.

A brittle star's nervous system is wrapped around in a ring shape around their body disk and has no discernible front or back. So that means they never really have to turn. Want to go another direction? Just pick a new front arm and go with it. For us to turn, "we need to not only change the direction of movement, but we have to rotate our bodies," he said. "With these guys, it's like, 'now that's the front. I don't have to rotate my body disk.'"

We might find them slow, but for echinoderms—a group that includes sea urchins and sand dollars—brittle stars are pretty quick. Astley found that it took them about two seconds to coordinate movement with all of their arms.

"For an animal that doesn't have a central brain, they're pretty remarkable," he said.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe