“Wikithon” Honors Ada Lovelace and Other Women in Science

A Wikipedia edit-a-thon seems like a fitting tribute to the woman many consider to be the first computer programmer. October 16 is Ada Lovelace Day, an annual observation designed to raise awareness of the contributions of women in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) disciplines.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A Wikipedia edit-a-thon seems like a fitting tribute to the woman many consider to be the first computer programmer. October 16 is Ada Lovelace Day, an annual observation designed to raise awareness of the contributions of women in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) disciplines. Groups in the U.S., U.K., Sweden and India are marking the occasion by creating and improving upon the Wikipedia pages of prominent women in STEM fields.

Born in 1815 in England, Ada Lovelace was a mathematician who became interested in computer pioneer Charles Babbage's "analytical engine." This machine, which was never actually built, would have been the first Turing-complete computer, meaning it would have been capable performing of the same computations as modern computers, albeit not necessarily quickly. In notes about the analytical engine, Lovelace wrote an algorithm to make the machine compute Bernoulli numbers, an important sequence in number theory. Although it was never executed, her creation is considered by some to be the first computer program. She died of uterine cancer when she was only 36.

But you don't have to take my word for it. Check out this cute cartoon video about Lovelace's life, created by BrainPOP.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Science writer Maia Weinstock is the organizer of the U.S. Ada Lovelace Day edit-a-thon. She helped compile a list of scientists who should have Wikipedia pages or whose pages need cleaning up. "Some people might prefer to work on pages about more well-known scientists: Marie Curie, Rosalind Franklin, Elizabeth Blackwell or even Ada Lovelace herself," she says. For those pages, relatively simple tasks such as double-checking references are helpful.

On the other hand, she says, "some people would rather add women who aren't even on Wikipedia at all." As an example, she mentions Catherine Wolf, a psychologist and artificial intelligence researcher who has been living with ALS, or Lou Gehrig's disease, since the late 1990s. She has done significant research on Lou Gehrig's disease since being diagnosed, even though at this point her motion is limited to the use of her eyebrows. "She's an amazing scientist, and nobody knows about her," Weinstock says.

For people who haven't edited Wikipedia before, the organizers will be giving short demonstrations of how to start editing the online encyclopedia.

Everyone is invited to pitch in for the Wikithon, but Weinstock says that a secondary goal of the project is to encourage more women to edit Wikipedia. Only about 10 to 15 percent of regular contributors to Wikipedia are women. "The fact that women aren't contributing is significant." It's rather odd, she says, considering the many women editors at science magazines and websites.

If you want to get involved in the Wikithon, visit the event's Wikipedia page to find out more. Boston dwellers can join the event in person, but the organizers do request an RSVP. If you're participating remotely, just edit articles about women scientists and add your contributions to the "results" section of the page.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe