A letter to readers: Participate in our Future of Cities survey

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Dear Scientific American Reader:

Scientific American is conducting a survey about the future of cities, the results of which will be published in the magazine along with a series of articles on urban life in the 21st century. The survey will poll elected officials, academics, policymakers, and opinion leaders, including Scientific American readers, about ways to improve cities and their livability.

As part of this effort, we are also soliciting reader opinions in response to the following question (some reply excerpts might be published in our September 2011 issue or at ScientificAmerican.com):


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"What is one innovation, technological or otherwise, that would make any city a substantially more livable place? (More livable can apply to any of various dimensions: sustainability, health, social equity, business climate, personal welfare, municipal services or any other quality.)

Please reply as if there were no fiscal or political constraints. As a science and technology magazine, we are particularly interested in new technologies that might benefit city dwellers. Some approaches that might be of interest include those that mitigate the effects of greenhouse gases or accommodate changing demographics; improve economic productivity, transport, water supply or waste disposal—or even facilitate new forms of social networking.

If your answer has nothing to do with technical issues (perhaps it concerns socioeconomic topics, such as crime or poverty), we are still very interested in your reply. Of course, every municipality can always benefit from improved finances, so it would be best if your answer did not address the persistent need for more funding.

To participate, please limit your response to a few sentences (no more than two paragraphs) and e-mail it to the following address: 

sci.am.cities@gmail.com. Please also provide your full name, place of residence and contact information. We can't publish anonymous replies. If you have particular expertise in urban affairs, please specify this in your response. Thank you for considering this request. We look forward to your input.

Best regards,

Mariette DiChristina

Editor in Chief

Scientific American

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe