Ada Lovelace and Gender Diversity in Science

Ada Lovelace, widely regarded as the first computer programmer, would probably have appreciated the current thinking on diversity in the workplace.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Stylized portrait of Ada Lovelace, based on a watercolor by Alfred Edward Chalon

Ada Lovelace, widely regarded as the first computer programmer, would probably have appreciated the current thinking on diversity in the workplace. Studies suggest that for tasks that involve creativity and innovation, on top of our game when we're working with people who challenge us to leave our comfort zones (a theme we explored in a special report). Lovelace, born in 1815 in England, "was a mathematician who became interested in computer pioneer Charles Babbage’s 'analytical engine'," wrote SA blogger Evelyn Lamb.

On the occasion of Ada Lovelace Day last year, we had a great discussion on Google Hangout about the role of women in Science Publishing with SA editor in chief Mariette DiChristina, Nature chief commissioning editor Sara Abdulla, Dr. Amy Brand, VP of Academic and Research Relations at Digital Science, and yours truly, hosted by Dr. Buddhini Samarasinghe and Dr Zuleyka Zevallos.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This isn't the first time we've recognized Ada Lovelace Day. Here are some of our past stories:

Channeling Ada Lovelace: Chien-Shiung Wu, Courageous Hero of Physics (October 15, 2013)

Review: Maria Mitchell and the Sexing of Science (October 16, 2012)

Ada Lovelace and Luddites (October 7, 2011)

The Urban Scientist: Celebrating Ada Lovelace (October 7, 2011)

 

Fred Guterl is the executive editor of Scientific American and author of The Fate of the Species (Bloomsbury). Guterl is former deputy editor of Newsweek. His writing and editing have contributed to numerous awards and nominations from the American Society of Magazine Editors. His article "Riddles in the Sand," in Discover, was named best magazine article in 1998 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and his Newsweek article "The Wasteland," on Russia's plan to accept the world's nuclear waste, was honored by the Overseas Press Club for environmental writing.

More by Fred Guterl

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe