After a Martian Marathon, NASA's Opportunity Rover Faces Uncertain Future

It's been a long time coming, but this week NASA's Mars Opportunity rover completed the first-ever Martian marathon. After landing on the Red Planet in January 2004 on a mission originally planned to only last 90 days, Opportunity has instead endured for more than a decade, and has taken eleven years and two months to [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


It’s been a long time coming, but this week NASA’s Mars Opportunity rover completed the first-ever Martian marathon. After landing on the Red Planet in January 2004 on a mission originally planned to only last 90 days, Opportunity has instead endured for more than a decade, and has taken eleven years and two months to travel the marathon-standard 42.195 kilometers. On average, that’s only about ten meters per day—slower even than a snail’s pace.

“This is the first time any human enterprise has exceeded the distance of a marathon on the surface of another world,” says John Callas, Opportunity’s project manager at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. “A first time happens only once.”

The Opportunity team at JPL is planning a marathon-length relay run next week to celebrate the milestone.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This mission isn’t about setting distance records, of course; it’s about making scientific discoveries on Mars and inspiring future explorers to achieve even more,” said Steve Squyres, Opportunity’s principal investigator at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. “Still, running a marathon on Mars feels pretty cool.”

Opportunity broke off-world distance records last year when it surpassed the 39-kilometer lunar traverse made by the Soviet Union’s Lunokhod 2 rover in 1973. Its sister rover, Spirit, which landed on the Red Planet two weeks before Opportunity, managed to trundle 7.7 kilometers before being mired in soft sand and finally succumbing to the harsh Martian winter in 2010.

During its long journey, Opportunity has found a wealth of evidence suggesting that Mars was once a much wetter, warmer place, with ancient lakes that could have been favorable environments for microbial life. The rover’s marathon has taken it to the edge of Endeavour Crater, and the science team now hopes to send the rover into “Marathon Valley,” a region of the crater rim with steep, clay-rich slopes. Studying the clay layers in the slope could reveal even more about the planet’s past and present habitability, and Mars-focused researchers are eagerly awaiting Opportunity’s next phase.

But all is not well with the Opportunity’s support back on Earth, and the mission’s next phase may be cut short. Opportunity costs about $14 million per year to operate, but that funding is in jeopardy. NASA’s newer, bigger, nuclear-powered Curiosity rover is the only other spacecraft presently on Mars, and takes up the lion’s share of resources for ongoing surface operations. NASA’s proposed budget for 2016 includes no money at all for operating Opportunity, despite an agency Senior Review panel ranking Opportunity’s proposed science plan the highest out of all current Mars missions.

Final funding levels will be set when Congress modifies the proposed budget before passing it, but Opportunity will still face long odds.

The agency’s administrator, Charles Bolden, has made it plain the mission’s days are numbered. Testifying before the Senate earlier this month, Bolden called Opportunity a mission “whose time has passed.” Continuing it, he said, would hinder NASA’s ability to pursue new, more ambitious science missions to Mars. Congress may modify NASA’s proposed budget before passing it, but with its marathon behind it, Opportunity’s roving days seem almost at an end.

Lee Billings is a science journalist specializing in astronomy, physics, planetary science, and spaceflight and is senior desk editor for physical science at Scientific American. He is author of a critically acclaimed book, Five Billion Years of Solitude: The Search for Life Among the Stars, which in 2014 won a Science Communication Award from the American Institute of Physics. In addition to his work for Scientific American, Billings’s writing has appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Boston Globe, Wired, New Scientist, Popular Science and many other publications. Billings joined Scientific American in 2014 and previously worked as a staff editor at SEED magazine. He holds a B.A. in journalism from the University of Minnesota.

More by Lee Billings

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe