Allegations of spying and links to terrorism land scientists in hot water

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Two researchers, one a physicist working on the Large Hadron Collider in Europe and the other a space scientist with leading roles on several lunar satellite missions, have run afoul of the authorities this month for alleged terrorist links and attempted spying, respectively.

On October 8, an LHC physicist—since identified by news outlets as Adlène Hicheur—was arrested in France and later preliminarily charged with terrorism offenses "after investigators said that he offered to work with the North African branch of al-Qaeda," according to the Times of London. CERN, the European lab for particle physics that operates the giant particle collider, was quick to note that the suspect is not an employee of CERN but of one of the lab's user institutes and that the LHC, despite its billing as the world's most powerful atom smasher, is not the kind of device that could be used for terrorism.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In an interview with Nature News on October 13, Hicheur's brother Halim maintained his sibling's innocence, saying that the arrest probably stemmed from the physicist's purchase of a plot of land in Algeria, the family's ancestral homeland.

More recently, another scientist working on high-profile projects was arrested, this one under allegations of attempted espionage. On Monday the Department of Justice announced that space scientist Stewart Nozette had been apprehended and charged with attempting to sell classified U.S. defense information to an undercover FBI employee posing as an Israeli intelligence officer.

According to a statement from the Justice Department, Nozette received $11,000 in two cash drops in exchange for secret information, some of which "concerned U.S. satellites, early warning systems, means of defense or retaliation against large-scale attack, communications intelligence information, and major elements of defense strategy."

Nozette has a distinguished résumé, having worked on NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, the joint Clementine mission led by the military and NASA in the 1990s, and the Indian Chandrayaan 1 spacecraft. (On Tuesday a Talking Points Memo blogger outlined circumstantial evidence suggesting that Nozette may have already passed information to India.) Clementine, a lunar orbiter, took radar readings of the moon's poles that indicated possible stores of water ice there—a finding reported in Science in 1996 with Nozette as the lead author.

The Clementine radar detection set off a series of follow-up observations that have yet to settle the issue, most recently the controlled double impact of NASA's Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) earlier this month. Data have yet to be fully analyzed from the plume ejected by the LCROSS crashes into a shadowed crater near the moon's south pole.

Photo of Nozette: NASA

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe