Altered Virus Calls Out Hidden Cancer Cells--and Might Help Fight Them, Too

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Most forms of cancer still must be spotted visually to be diagnosed. But if a newly devised virus can do the job, it could track down cancer cells too small or well hidden to be seen in scans. It might also help shrink tumors, too.

The virus in question is a herpes virus, modified genetically to act only on cancer cells.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Using mice, researchers injected the altered virus, which then "deliver[s] genetic information that induces a known blood biomarker for cancer to be secreted by cancer cells," Timothy Cripe, a physician in the Division of Oncology at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and co-author of a new paper outlining the technique, said in a prepared statement.

The biomarker, Gaussia luciferase, is easy for researchers to spot via urine or blood tests. The virus might also help to diminish any existing tumors, the study authors reported, making it a so-called theragnostic compound. Altered versions of smallpox and herpes viruses are already in clinical trials to help battle back cancer. 

The virus made cancer cells produce detectable levels of the biomarker in 90 percent of subject mice with bone cancer, muscle cancer, Ewing's sarcoma and other forms of malignant tumors. It even raised glowing flags in mice that had microscopic amounts of cancer cells hiding in their kidneys, suggesting that in humans it might work to root out tumors that are just millimeters across.

The researchers do raise concerns about possible immune responses to the virus, and even cancer-free mice showed low levels of the biomarker. Cripe noted that "there is certainly room for further refinement." But, he added, "If ultimately validated in human trials, it could have implications for people with known cancer risk or who have had a history of cancer." It could also be used to help track the progress of treatment.

Except for the few types of cancer for which there are already known biomarkers, such as prostate and some liver cancers, broader cancer screening has been hampered by high costs and limited access to sophisticated equipment. But given the viral injection method's simplicity, it could help make cancer screening more universal.

It could also prove especially helpful in improving cancer diagnosis in areas that lack advanced imaging equipment, such as remote or developing regions. And that could help stem the costs of cancer care, which are expected to rise to exceed $157 billion—and be as high as $207 billion—in the U.S. alone by 2020, by reducing the rates of expensive established cancers that escape early-stage diagnosis.

"Early cancer detection is vital to improve cure rates," Cripe said. "Cancer stage predicts prognosis."

The study was published online May 11 in PLoS ONE.

Image courtesy of iStockphoto/Henrik5000

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe