Animals with Big Brains Are Better at Problem Solving [Video]

The idea that bigger is better when it comes to thinking is controversial, but it just got a scientific boost

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A new study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences supports the controversial hypothesis that big brains are better for problem solving. 

In this video, zoo animals were presented the task of getting  food out of a puzzle box. Each animal was got 30 minutes to figure out how to slide a bolt to open the box and get its favorite food. 

The lead author, Sarah Benson-Amram, an assistant professor in the Department of Zoology and Physiology at the University of Wyoming, explained in a press release that “[t]his study offers a rare look at problem solving in carnivores, and the results provide important support for the claim that brain size reflects an animal's problem-solving abilities—and enhance our understanding of why larger brains evolved in some species.” 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ben Dantzer, an assistant professor at the University of Michigan is another author. He explains in the press release that, "Overall, 35 percent of animals (49 individuals from 23 species) were successful in solving the problem. The bears were the most successful, solving the problem almost 70 percent of the time. Meerkats and mongooses were the least successful, with no individuals from their species solving the problem."

The species in this video,  listed in order of appearance, are:  Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens), Binturong (Arctictis binturong), Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos), White-nosed Coati (Nasua narica), Bobcat (Lynx rufus), Arctic Fox (Alopex lagopus), Polar Bear (Ursus maritimus), Black Bear (Ursus americanus), Snow Leopard (Panthera uncia), Pallas cat (Otocolobus manul), Striped Hyena (Hyaena hyaena), Spotted Hyena (Crocuta crocuta), American Badger (Taxidea taxus), Leopard (Panthera pardus), Amur Tiger (Panthera tigris), River Otter (Lontra canadensis), Maned Wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus), Wild Dog (Lycaon pictus), and Wolverine (Gulo gulo).

 

Eliene Augenbraun is a multimedia science producer, formerly Nature Research's Multimedia Managing Editor and Scientific American's senior video producer. Before that, she founded and ran ScienCentral, an award-winning news service providing ABC and NBC with science news stories. She has a PhD in Biology.

More by Eliene Augenbraun

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe