Astronomers Catch Black Hole Spitting Out Material

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


AUSTIN, Tex.—One of the great ironies of the universe is that black holes, the ultimate vacuum cleaners, create more of a mess than they clean up. (It is a complaint that many people who finally prevailed on spouses and roommates to clean up after themselves might appreciate.) How is it that, in sucking up surrounding material, they squirt much of it right back out? A team of astronomers has now caught a black hole in the act.

The hole in question, a modest-size one located near the center of our galaxy known as H1743-322, had been known to flare up in x-rays every eight months or so, presumably as it periodically munched on a nearby star. Gregory Sivakoff of the University of Alberta and his colleagues kept watch on the black hole in mid-2009 using the Very Long Baseline Array (a worldwide array of radio telescopes) and the Rossi X-ray Timing Observatory (a satellite that NASA shut down last week after 16 years in operation). On May 28 and 30 and June 2, all seemed normal. But on June 5, the radio telescopes spotted bright knots of material flying away in opposite directions. By June 6, the knots had moved a substantial distance, implying a velocity of a quarter of the speed of light. Working backward, the team deduced the material had been shot out on June 2, 2009, at about 10:00 P.M. Universal Time, give or take half a day. The researchers announced their finding today during a meeting of the American Astronomical Society being held here.

The x-ray images, meanwhile, showed some unusual goings-on in the disk of material swirling around the black hole. On May 28 and 30, there was a spot in the disk revolving once per second. On June 2, the spot sped up threefold—and after the ejection, there was no spot at all. Sivakoff said it was a chunk of orbiting material that death-spiraled into the hole.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers still need to sort out exactly how the infalling spot turned to outflying knots. One idea, Sivakoff said, is that material dragged along magnetic field lines on its way in. At some point, the field lines snapped like rubber bands; north- and south-oriented lines reconnected, unleashing energy that flung particles outward. Another idea is that the plummeting material created a shock wave that energized outgoing stuff.

Through such processes, black holes are the most powerful engines in the universe, converting gravitational energy to heat, light and kinetic energy of particles. In return for untidiness, they keep the universe a vibrant place.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe