Astronomers Catch Black Hole Spitting Out Material

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


AUSTIN, Tex.—One of the great ironies of the universe is that black holes, the ultimate vacuum cleaners, create more of a mess than they clean up. (It is a complaint that many people who finally prevailed on spouses and roommates to clean up after themselves might appreciate.) How is it that, in sucking up surrounding material, they squirt much of it right back out? A team of astronomers has now caught a black hole in the act.

The hole in question, a modest-size one located near the center of our galaxy known as H1743-322, had been known to flare up in x-rays every eight months or so, presumably as it periodically munched on a nearby star. Gregory Sivakoff of the University of Alberta and his colleagues kept watch on the black hole in mid-2009 using the Very Long Baseline Array (a worldwide array of radio telescopes) and the Rossi X-ray Timing Observatory (a satellite that NASA shut down last week after 16 years in operation). On May 28 and 30 and June 2, all seemed normal. But on June 5, the radio telescopes spotted bright knots of material flying away in opposite directions. By June 6, the knots had moved a substantial distance, implying a velocity of a quarter of the speed of light. Working backward, the team deduced the material had been shot out on June 2, 2009, at about 10:00 P.M. Universal Time, give or take half a day. The researchers announced their finding today during a meeting of the American Astronomical Society being held here.

The x-ray images, meanwhile, showed some unusual goings-on in the disk of material swirling around the black hole. On May 28 and 30, there was a spot in the disk revolving once per second. On June 2, the spot sped up threefold—and after the ejection, there was no spot at all. Sivakoff said it was a chunk of orbiting material that death-spiraled into the hole.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers still need to sort out exactly how the infalling spot turned to outflying knots. One idea, Sivakoff said, is that material dragged along magnetic field lines on its way in. At some point, the field lines snapped like rubber bands; north- and south-oriented lines reconnected, unleashing energy that flung particles outward. Another idea is that the plummeting material created a shock wave that energized outgoing stuff.

Through such processes, black holes are the most powerful engines in the universe, converting gravitational energy to heat, light and kinetic energy of particles. In return for untidiness, they keep the universe a vibrant place.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe