Black Hole "Blazars" Reveal Hidden Side of the Universe [Video]

The bright lights from these hungry black holes revealed a subtle background field

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Blazars, some of the most powerful phenomena in the universe, are gigantic black holes at the centers of galaxies that are gorging on matter and shooting out jets of particles and light. This light is so bright astronomers can spot blazars from billions of light-years across the universe.

Recently, scientists used blazars to see another type of light that would otherwise be impossible to detect. The extragalactic background light (EBL) is a radiation field pervading space that includes the light emitted by all the stars in all the galaxies over the entire history of the universe. Despite its plentitude, this light is hard to see because it is diffuse throughout the sky and is outshone by brighter foreground sources. Some of the researchers who finally detected the EBL in 2013 after roughly a decade of searching describe how they did it with the help of blazars in Scientific American’s June feature article “All the Light There Ever Was,” by Alberto Domínguez, Joel R. Primack and Trudy E. Bell.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center

Blazars emit copious amounts of gamma rays, which are very high-energy photons. As the gamma rays fly through space they sometimes collide with lower-energy EBL photons, and the two can destroy one another. Thus, the farther blazars’ light travels, the more it will tend to get dimmed through interactions with the background light. The researchers figured out how to calculate how bright the gamma rays should have been when originally emitted by blazars, and then compared those figures with measurements of various blazars’ actual brightness as seen from Earth to determine how much light had been lost to the EBL, which in turn gave them the first measurement of the EBL itself.

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe