Black Hole "Blazars" Reveal Hidden Side of the Universe [Video]

The bright lights from these hungry black holes revealed a subtle background field

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Blazars, some of the most powerful phenomena in the universe, are gigantic black holes at the centers of galaxies that are gorging on matter and shooting out jets of particles and light. This light is so bright astronomers can spot blazars from billions of light-years across the universe.

Recently, scientists used blazars to see another type of light that would otherwise be impossible to detect. The extragalactic background light (EBL) is a radiation field pervading space that includes the light emitted by all the stars in all the galaxies over the entire history of the universe. Despite its plentitude, this light is hard to see because it is diffuse throughout the sky and is outshone by brighter foreground sources. Some of the researchers who finally detected the EBL in 2013 after roughly a decade of searching describe how they did it with the help of blazars in Scientific American’s June feature article “All the Light There Ever Was,” by Alberto Domínguez, Joel R. Primack and Trudy E. Bell.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center

Blazars emit copious amounts of gamma rays, which are very high-energy photons. As the gamma rays fly through space they sometimes collide with lower-energy EBL photons, and the two can destroy one another. Thus, the farther blazars’ light travels, the more it will tend to get dimmed through interactions with the background light. The researchers figured out how to calculate how bright the gamma rays should have been when originally emitted by blazars, and then compared those figures with measurements of various blazars’ actual brightness as seen from Earth to determine how much light had been lost to the EBL, which in turn gave them the first measurement of the EBL itself.

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe