BP prepares for "top kill" of Deepwater Horizon oil spill

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


How do you stop a leaking oil well nearly two kilometers beneath the surface of the Gulf of Mexico? The latest effort, following the insert that siphoned some fraction of the gushing petroleum, will be to pump a mixture of thick drilling mud into the well in an attempt to stop it up like clogging a toilet. BP itself gives the operation a roughly 60 percent chance of working and hopes to undertake it on May 26.

This is the same method that stopped the most recent similar oil spill this past November—a gushing deep water well in the Timor Sea near Australia—after four tries. It will be a delicate procedure, as evidenced by the laborious (and clumsy) preparations of the underwater robots.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If all else fails, or this effort doesn't stop all the oil, it may be followed by the cunningly named "junk shot," stuffing tires, golf balls and other detritus into the well to further plug it up.

Regardless, this well will not be well and truly "killed" until another well is drilled to intersect it and permanently cap the gusher, an effort that will probably take until at least August. Obviously, it is already too late to avoid some of the worst impacts to birds and other wildlife as well as the Gulf Coast wetlands they call home as oil is already beginning to coast the marshes and beaches of Louisiana. Unfortunately, that's a kill we know will work.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe