Breast cancer deaths drop over past two decades

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The number of women who die from breast cancer has decreased slowly (about 2 percent per year) but steadily since 1990, according to a new report by the American Cancer Society (ACS), released to mark the start of Breast Cancer Awareness Month.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer—other than skin cancer—for women in the U.S., and it is second only to lung cancer as the most deadly. More than 40,000 women will die from breast cancer this year, the ACS reports.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Breast cancer remains a major fear for women living in the U.S. and a major cause of cancer death," Otis Brawley, ACS's chief medical officer said in a prepared statement. But, he added, "We've now identified major risk factors for breast cancer, many of which are modifiable."

One of the major contributors to the drop, the report authors note, has been a decrease in the use of post-menopausal hormone treatments. Other risk factors that can help to stave off the disease, according to current medical research, include exercise, maintaining a healthy weight and consuming less than two alcoholic beverages per day.

Despite the encouraging news, the rates of breast cancer diagnosis and death, however, are still unequal among races. Although white women are more likely to be diagnosed with the disease, black women have a 40 percent higher death rate, a statistic the ACS attributes in part to a lack of access in some minority communities to crucial early detection measures, such as frequent mammograms. 

"The steady drop in the breast cancer death rate means that this year alone, about 15,000 breast cancer deaths were avoided," John Seffrin, C.E.O. of ACS, said in a prepared statement. Part of the decline may be due in part to the massive awareness campaigns that have brought fundraising walks to towns nationwide and even pink equipment to football players in the National Football League, as The New York Times recently reported.

As many note, however, it will likely take more than pink rubber wrist bands to continue to improve the numbers. It will be important to increase the rate of early detection, especially in underserved populations, and to reduce the incidence of avoidable risk factors, such as ever-increasing obesity, Bloomberg News reported. "We have a tremendous opportunity to improve the numbers," Ahmedin Jemal, a co-author on the report and epidemiologist told Bloomberg.

Image courtesy of iStockphoto/skodonnell

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe