Brian Marsden, longtime director of the Minor Planet Center, dead at 73

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Brian G. Marsden, who as director of the International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center (MPC) was the official record keeper for most of the astronomical discoveries in the solar system in recent decades, died November 18, according to an obituary bulletin from the MPC. He was 73.

The MPC, housed since Marsden took it over in 1978 at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory in Cambridge, Mass., serves as a clearinghouse of data collected by observers around the world, amateur and professional alike. The center catalogues the data and computes orbits for objects such as near-Earth asteroids, main-belt asteroids, comets, and distant bodies in a region near the orbit of Pluto known as the Kuiper Belt. It also notifies astronomers of which newfound objects are in need of follow-up observations and confirmation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Marsden served as MPC director until 2006, when he began serving in an emeritus capacity. The center's mission was a natural fit for Marsden, who as an 11-year-old in England was already working on ways to calculate the motion of the planets, according to the MPC bulletin. He studied at the University of Oxford, working on the orbital mechanics of comets, and moved to Yale University for graduate school.

In 1965 he came to the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, where he continued to work on the motion of small bodies in the solar system and eventually took the helm of the MPC. As director, he took some heat in 1998 for suggesting that a large, newly discovered asteroid called 1997 XF11 had a chance—however slight—of striking Earth in the future. The announcement created a public stir, but analysis of more data essentially nullified the probability of impact.

The field of solar system studies changed dramatically during Marsden's MPC tenure. When he took over the center, the solar system had been catalogued in comparably little detail. Virtually all near-Earth asteroids, of which some 7,000 are now known, have been discovered in just the past 15 years. And the presence of the Kuiper Belt had yet to be confirmed; until 1992 Pluto was a lonely planet in the outer reaches of the solar system. Before long the books were filling up with Kuiper Belt objects, some of them rather large, and Pluto was demoted by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) in 2006 to a dwarf planet. As minder of the records that rendered the erstwhile ninth planet rather ordinary-looking, it was fitting that Marsden relinquished his position just as Pluto did.

"It was also at the IAU meeting in Prague that Dr. Marsden stepped down as MPC director," the MPC bulletin states, "and he was quite entertained by the thought that both he and Pluto had been retired on the same day." The obituary did not provide a cause of death.

For more on Marsden, see Steve Nadis's profile of the astronomer and his work with near-Earth asteroids, which appeared in the August 2003 issue of Scientific American.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe