Budget crunch could prematurely shutter Tevatron

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


It has been a rough 2011 for the physicists working on the Tevatron, the top particle collider in the U.S. and the second most powerful in the world after Europe's Large Hadron Collider. On January 10, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, which operates the Tevatron, announced that the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) had denied a proposed three-year extension of the collider. The particle physics giant, then, would be retired in the fall of 2011.

Now things are looking even bleaker for Fermilab and the Tevatron. The Fermilab Neighborhood blog reports that lab director Pier Oddone said at an all-hands meeting February 15 that budget cuts proposed in the House of Representatives would force a number of drastic measures at Fermilab. Among them: an immediate shutdown of all accelerators, two-month staff furloughs, and probable layoffs of some 400 employees. (A PowerPoint of Oddone's talk is available here.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The budget bill, HR 1, which was introduced by the House Appropriations Committee February 11, contains more than $100 billion in total cuts from the budget request for 2011 that President Obama submitted over a year ago. Of those cuts, more than $1.1 billion comes from the DoE science budget, a roughly 20 percent reduction from 2010 levels.

The budget submitted by the Obama administration, on the other hand, would increase the DoE science budget by 4.4 percent, an outlay that would likely allow the Tevatron to run until September as planned.

The government is now well into the 2011 fiscal year, which began October 1, 2010, without a budget in place; agencies have been operating on a series of extensions that funded them at 2010 levels. (The latest extension expires March 4.) So whatever cost-cutting measures are enacted in the final budget bill will have roughly double the effect. If Fermilab, for instance, has to cut 20 percent of its annual budget with only six or seven months' notice, the lab will have to slash its expenditures by 35 to 40 percent over the remainder of the year to meet that target.

Photo and diagram of Tevatron: Fermilab

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe