Calling All 2018 Candidates: We Want Your Positions on Science and Technology

Until we insist that candidates address science and technology policy when campaigning, we cannot expect them to do so once they’re in office

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Science is inherently related to every significant challenge of the 21st century, yet in 2017, scientific experts have been increasingly ignored, dismissed and silenced by policymakers.

Today, Science Debate is calling for all House, Senate and Gubernatorial candidates running for office across parties to respond to 10 questions related to the greatest science policy challenges facing America. Topics cover a wide range of issues from scientific integrity in policymaking to health, cyber security medicine and the environment.

Since 2008, every major presidential candidate has answered a series of questions on science policy put forth by Science Debate and our broad coalition of partners (including Scientific American).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In his response to Science Debate last Fall, President Donald Trump pledged:

“My administration will ensure that there will be total transparency and accountability [regarding science] without political bias. The American people deserve this and I will make sure this is the culture of my administration.”

After many 2018 Congressional candidates inquired about participating in a similar Q&A, our team at Science Debate decided to open questions across levels of government. We believe that every incoming politician should be prepared to address issues crucial to voters, our children and the future of our planet.

On our website, you’ll find a map where you can select your state and read about the science policy positions of those running for office where you live as they come in.

Until we insist that candidates address science and technology policy when campaigning, we cannot expect them to do so once they’re in office. We encourage you to reach out to candidates in your communities and encourage them to participate in Science Debate’s 2018 Election Initiative!

Visit sciencedebate.org for more information about the 2018 election initiative as well as other ways to get involved in projects we’re working on. As a registered 501(c)(3), Science Debate is nonpartisan and all donations are tax-deductible.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe