Could we be on the verge of a new drug to treat lupus?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Systemic lupus is the most common form of the autoimmune disease, lupus, which afflicts about five million people worldwide and causes a slew of symptoms including fever, pain and swelling. Now, sufferers of systemic lupus may be closer to a new drug to treat their symptoms, according to the results of a study announced yesterday. If approved for the market, the drug, which was developed by Human Genome Sciences (HGS) and GlaxoSmithKline, would be the first new treatment for lupus in nearly half a century.

HGS and GlaxoSmithKline had already seen encouraging results with their drug, called Benlysta, in the first clinical trial of 860 patients that was completed in July of this year. The companies were waiting for the results of a second trial to file for approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. HGS states on its Web site that it will file for approval in the first half of 2010.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"The lupus community has waited for decades for one positive phase three trial of an investigative drug developed for lupus. Now we have two," said Joan Merrill, a lupus expert at the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, in a statement issued by the two companies. Merrill was an investigator in the trial.

In lupus, the body's immune system attacks its own tissues, with dire outcomes. The most frequent symptoms of systemic lupus are an increase in blood pressure in the lungs as well as inflammation of the kidneys, nervous system and brain. Because the disease is chronic, it persists for more than six weeks, and usually for many years, with symptoms fading in and out of intensity.

A number of factors have been associated with the onset of lupus. Environmental triggers, such as ultraviolet radiation and viral or bacterial infections, may play a part in some cases. In particular, peaks in estrogen levels in women, who make up 90 percent of lupus patients, seem to usher in lupus symptoms. In addition, familial cases of lupus, and the incidence of lupus in pairs of identical twins, suggest that genes are involved. No research as yet, however, has identified which genes are involved in the disease.

Human Genome's Benlysta would be among the first drugs to arise from genomic studies, The New York Times reported. The company based the drug on its discovery of a protein that stimulates B-cells and could be responsible for the autoimmune activity in lupus patients. Benlysta is an antibody that binds and inhibits this stimulating protein.

In the second clinical trial, involving 819 participants, 40.6 percent of the patients who took Benlysta for a year experienced relief from their lupus symptoms, compared to 33.8 percent of the placebo group. Patients in both groups continued to take steroids, which is the conventional treatment for lupus. Whereas steroids have traditionally been used to quell lupus symptoms by suppressing the immune system, they can lead to a number of side effects. In this study, improvement was assessed based on reports from doctors and the proportion of patients who could be weaned off of steroids.

"We take great pride in the innovation and scientific rigor that has made it possible to bring Benlysta to this point," H. Thomas Watkins, HGS president and chief executive officer, said in a prepared statement.

Despite the generally positive results with Benlysta, the results of the second clinical trial fall short of the first in at least one respect. Unlike in the first trial, only the higher of the two doses of drug achieved results statistically better than the placebo. HGS and GlaxoSmithKline say that patients who took Benlysta did not experience side effects.

Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

Carina Storrs is a freelance writer in New York City. The Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting provided travel support for this story, which originally appeared in Nature.

More by Carina Storrs

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe