Data Gluttony Scuttles Unlimited Mobile Download Plans

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


All-you-can-eat data downloads seemed like a good way to sell fancy smart phones at first, but now wireless carriers AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile are slowing down the buffet line. A minority of customers who keep refilling their digital dinner plates (while others are still working on the first course) have helped the wireless providers realize that offering unlimited data plans doesn't add up. One exception appears to be Sprint, which still touts an $80 per month unlimited plan. Perhaps their customers are better at portion control.

AT&T on Friday announced that some smart-phone customers with unlimited data plans may experience reduced speeds once their data usage puts them among the top 5 percent of heaviest users. The company says that these most prolific users consume on average 12 times more than the normal smart-phone customer over its cellular network (AT&T isn't counting data consumed via WiFi).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"To rank among the top 5 percent, you have to use an extraordinary amount of data in a single billing period," the company said in a statement. AT&T pointed out that throttling data access—which will begin October 1—will not affect its 15 million smart-phone customers on a tiered data plan or even the vast majority of smart-phone customers with unlimited data plans.

AT&T isn't the first to see that unlimited data download packages are going to create problems for their networks. Nearly one-third of mobile operators worldwide have already implemented an application-aware charging model to even out smart-phone access to bandwidth clogging sites such as YouTube, according to a report recently released by researcher Allot Communications. YouTube is the single most popular mobile Internet destination, accounting for 22 percent of mobile data bandwidth usage and 52 percent of total video streaming.

Mobile providers have been looking for ways to reduce the volume of data transferred over their cellular networks rather than invest in expanding their core infrastructures.  This includes promoting portable base stations as a way to create a mini infrastructure that diverts large multimedia downloads from the main cellular network.

Image courtesy of Neustockimages, via iStockphoto.com

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe