Dimming city lights may help reduce smog

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


SAN FRANCISCO—City lights may do more than hide a starry sky: they could indirectly worsen daytime smog. Measurements of light pollution over Los Angeles have revealed a brighter glow than chemists expected—bright enough to destroy chemicals that would otherwise help cleanse the air during a dark night.

“Light pollution can slow down nighttime cleansing,” said Harald Stark of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. He is based in Boulder, Colo., and reported the findings December 14 here at a meeting of the American Geophysical Union.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“I don’t think anybody had thought about it,” says Jochen Stotz, an atmospheric chemist at the University of California, Los Angeles. “It shows that what happens at night is really important” for air quality, adds Stotz, who was not involved in the NOAA study. “We’ll have to see how important.”

The surprising hypothesis is for now just that—a hypothesis, Stark warned during a press conference. The chemistry of smog formation is very complex, and the effects of city lights are hard to quantify without further research, he said.

During several flights of a NOAA airplane this summer, Stark and his team found that the glow of Los Angeles was 10,000 times weaker than sunlight, but still 25 times brighter than a full moon. The researchers calculated that such an amount of light would be enough to break down nitrite in the air. Nitrite (NO3) indirectly reduces the daytime ozone levels because it reacts with other nitrogen compounds that are involved in ozone-forming reactions. So whereas in darker regions nitrite acts as a night cleanser, over L.A. it could be reduced, with the effect of exacerbating smog.

The impacts could be worse over more northern cities in winter, Stark said, because snow cover and clouds have a multiplying effect on light pollution.

Stotz says he and his collaborators now plan to include the effects of light pollution in their models of atmospheric chemistry to try to quantify the NOAA findings. Even if the result is an increase of a few percentage points in ozone levels, it may make an important difference for communities that are already struggling to stay within the limits imposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Stark points out.

Cities may discover that controlling outdoors lighting may have more benefits than saving energy and keeping the stars shining.

Image: Typical western U.S. cities, such as Los Angeles, are defined by yellow-orange sodium vapor–lit streets in grids. Airport runways stand out as dark lines where, surprisingly, it is better to land an airplane on a dark runway than a well-lit one. At the edge of town, the lights abruptly fade into the surrounding desert. Credit: NASA

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe