Feathers developed differently in dinosaurs' life cycles than in those of modern birds

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A rare fossil find of two young feathered theropods has revealed that these animals sprouted a much wider range of plumage as they matured than contemporary birds do.

Researchers, led by Xing Xu of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology at the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, have described the specimens as Similicaudipteryx dinosaurs from the Lower Cretaceous. The fossils were found in western Liaoning Province in China. The two small oviraptors were preserved at different developmental stages and showed distinct feather types and patterning—much more so than is seen in the various stages of modern birds' maturation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"This find suggests that early feathers were developmentally more diverse than modern ones and that some developmental features, and the resultant morphotypes, have been lost in feather evolution," the researchers noted in their study, published online April 28 in Nature (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group).

The smaller of the two specimens (known as STM4-1) was less than a third of the size of the elder Similicaudipteryx (referred to as STM22-6). It had short ribbon-like flight feathers on the front forearms and much longer ones on the tail, in addition to downy "plumulaceous" feathers covering the rest of its body. The bigger of the two, STM22-6, had much longer, more developed pennaceous flight feathers on its forearms and tail, "possibly reflecting an increase in the functional role of the [wing feathers] as the individual approached adulthood," the authors suggested. It also had quite long (five centimeter-long) plumulaceous feathers around its head and pelvis.

This complex pattern of feather development is "not known in any modern bird," concluded Xu and his colleagues, despite the fact that theropod dinosaurs are the ancestors of modern birds. The team speculated that unlike the early expression of the genes that initiate growth of mature pennaceous feathers in today's young birds, activation of similar genes in the younger Similicaudipteryx "was probably delayed and incomplete," producing the curious and diverse state of feather growth seen in the two specimens.

Image of artists' rendering of the two different Similicaudipteryx specimens courtesy of Xing Lida and Song Qijin

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe