Fight over Sriracha Factory Simmers Down

Sriracha fans, you can breathe easy (and stop hoarding bottles of chili sauce)—the #srirachapocalypse has definitively ended. The San Gabriel Valley Tribune reported yesterday that the city of Irwindale, Calif.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sriracha fans, you can breathe easy (and stop hoarding bottles of chili sauce)—the #srirachapocalypse has definitively ended. The San Gabriel Valley Tribune reported yesterday that the city of Irwindale, Calif. dropped its lawsuit and public nuisance complaint against Sriracha maker Huy Fong Foods.

The legal conflict between Irwindale and Huy Fong began last fall when residents complained of eye and throat irritation caused by a foul smell exuded by the factory during its chili-grinding season. The company defended its sauce in court, but a judge ultimately ruled in favor of the city and told Huy Fong to fix its odor problem. After nine months, both parties have cooled off; the city voted to halt legal action and Huy Fong has installed a more powerful air filtration system, which factory owner David Tran tested out with pepper spray.

At the heart of the Sriracha debate is a fiery chili pepper compound called capsaicin. Though Huy Fong hung a banner outside its factory last year that stated “No tear gas made here,” there’s no doubt that capsaicin could have made the townspeople cry, as Scientific Americanreported in February. The irritating chemical interacts with temperature receptors on the body and tricks your brain into thinking you’re burning.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe