Forget Human Spaceflight: Send Worms Instead!

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Spaceflight is hard on the body, but, even so, a new study has found that the tiny nematode (or roundworm) Caenorhabditis elegans appears to age more slowly in space than on the ground. Whether the same is true of human tissue remains to be seen, although many genes in the millimeter-long worm have analogues in our own bodies (a reason C. elegans is often used as a simplified model organism for studying humans and other complex species).

In 2004, researchers sent colonies of C. elegans to the International Space Station (ISS), to see how the worms fared in low Earth orbit. A new analysis of those worms by researchers in Japan and England has found that the trip to space inactivated seven genes that have been shown to extend life when shut down. The genes appear to play a part in the worms’ systems of neuronal and hormonal signaling, and the response of those systems to being in space may have led to the slowed aging. The work appeared online July 5 in the open-access journal Scientific Reports. (Scientific Reports and Scientific American are both parts of Nature Publishing Group.)

Now, there are some caveats. For starters, a prior study found that spaceflight adversely affected muscle development in C. elegans. And the researchers stop short of claiming that the worms’ lives were definitively extended by their time in space. (In fact, both the astro-worms and a control population on the ground were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen at the end of the 10-day spaceflight, so all the worms died at the same time.) The genes whose activity was diminished in space have only been shown to boost longevity in lab studies on the ground. But the study’s authors did find that an aging biomarker—a fluorescent-tagged polyglutamine protein that tends to accumulate over time—was less prevalent in space-flown worms.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers note that they don’t yet know which aspect (or aspects) of the space environment caused the genetic changes. Was it the microgravity of the ISS? The increased radiation doses endured during spaceflight? One way to distinguish between the two would be to fly worms in space inside a centrifuge that simulates the gravitational forces organisms feel on Earth.

For now, though, it’s looking like the nematodes might be gifted with certain genetic attributes that benefit them in space. If only we could train worms to take pictures from orbit or make repairs to the Hubble Space Telescope, NASA could get out of the astronaut business entirely.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe