From gadfly to bureaucrat: The FTC's new chief technology officer

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Edward Felten, one of the most incisive minds of the digital age, has been appointed the chief technologist at the Federal Trade Commission.

Scientific American gave the Princeton professor an award in 2003 for his critiques of digital privacy.

The squib we ran at the time read:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Corporations intent on monopolizing the digital economy have come to fear Edward Felten, who has fought their claims with technical analysis sharpened by a sense of the ridiculous. When Microsoft, in its antitrust case, claimed that its browser could not be separated from its operating system, Felten separated them. When the Recording Industry Association of America unveiled a music-encryption technology, he found holes in it (and was almost sued for publishing the holes). Now he is fighting Hollywood’s efforts to introduce legislation mandating privacy devices for all digital products, particularly digital television. In testimony before Congress, he pointed out that a would-be pirate could already videotape a movie for a few dollars rather than go the digital route, which would cost hundreds of dollars. His Web site posts comical examples of devices, such as toys, that a proposed law would digitally bind and gag."

See Felten's Wikipedia entry for the long list of similar tussles.

What of a gadfly taking on the ponderous title of "chief technologist"? Wonderful. It's great when the best of the best make their way to Washington.

Image credit: Princeton University

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe